“I have to figure out a way to get it done,” said Scott, a runner up in this event in 2007 behind Vijay Singh. If turning 40 last July wasn’t enough of a reminder that time is of the essence, Scott enters 2021 determined to maximise the time he has to work on his game in the current climate and adapt better to the situation every player currently finds themselves in. The suspension of the season due to COVID-19, an extended stint at home in Australia, the reshuffled schedule of Majors and FedEx Cup playoff events and his own run-in with COVID-19 threw Scott off kilter, failing to finish inside the top 20 in any of the eight events he played following the resumption. The two-shot win at Riviera Country Club almost a year ago was Scott’s first PGA TOUR start for 2020 and signalled a strong intent to contend for a second green jacket at The Masters. The Post’s story does note that users who post child pornography or terrorist images are immediately removed.Scott returns to the Plantation Course at the Kapalua Resort on the island of Maui in Hawaii for the first time since 2014, his victory at the Genesis Invitational last February securing his spot alongside fellow Aussies Cameron Smith (Sony Open) and Marc Leishman (Farmers Insurance Open). Stone added that there are “one-and-done” violations and said the story mischaracterized how strikes and “other factors” cause an account to be removed at one strike. He wrote the story “excluded key examples” but did not clarify what they might be. Stone wrote that penalties become more severe for repeated violations and most violations are unintentional, which The Post included in its story.
#Before my time up full#
The story does mention this system but states the website does not explain what warrants a full ban or how certain types of policy violations are compared to others. They lay out the penalties for up to “five or more” violations but do not mention the 10-strike system. The Post reported that Facebook’s system for enforcing the ban is “shrouded in secrecy,” but Stone posted that the guidelines are available online. He said almost 90 percent of those who receive one strike will not receive more than one additional one, adding that violators are mostly unaware of Facebook’s policies and don’t violate them again once they are told about it.īut The Post reported that Facebook did not dispute that it has a 10-strikes rule.Īfter the story was published, Stone responded on Twitter, saying the article “distorts” the company’s approach to penalizing violators. “If we identify any serious violations that have the potential for real-world harm, we don’t hesitate to contact law enforcement,” Stone said. Facebook reportedly banned the private sale of guns on its website more than five years ago but has not publicly explained in much detail how the company enforces the ban.įacebook spokesman Andy Stone told The Post that the company takes down posts that violate its policy quickly and applies increasingly severe consequences for repeat offenders, up to permanently suspending an account.
The Post reported that Facebook’s guidelines also include a five-strikes system for gun sellers and buyers who call for violence or voice support for a “known dangerous organization” before they lose Facebook access. ( The Hill) – Facebook is allowing marketplace buyers and sellers to violate its ban on gun purchases 10 times before they are kicked off the platform, according to a Thursday report from The Washington Post.
0 kommentar(er)
